For more than seventy years, the Royal Court Theatre has defined itself as the writers’ theatre – a place where new voices are discovered, nurtured and brought to the stage. It is therefore no surprise that the Royal Court Young Playwrights Award, now in its second year, feels less like a competition and more like an investment in the future of British theatre.
Following its London pilot in 2025, the programme expanded nationwide this year, inviting young people aged 13 to 18 from across the UK to try their hand at playwriting. Between October 2025 and March 2026, the Royal Court delivered free workshops from Inverness to Exeter, resulting in more than 260 submissions. From these, six winning plays – three in the 13–15 category and three in the 16–18 category – were selected for professionally staged rehearsed readings in the Jerwood Theatre Upstairs between 9 and 11 July.
Rather than simply rewarding outstanding young playwrights, the programme aims to inspire more young people to write plays. As Beth Flintoff, the Royal Court’s Young Writers Associate, points out in the published anthology, many students leave school without ever having written a script. The Royal Court Young Playwrights Award addresses that gap by combining a national competition with workshops, individual feedback and professional development, placing as much emphasis on nurturing writers as on selecting winners.
The programme’s ambition is perhaps best illustrated by last year’s winner, Godot’s To-Do List by Leo Simpe-Asante. After winning the inaugural award, the play was given a full production on the Royal Court’s main stage as the curtain-raiser to Krapp’s Last Tape, starring Gary Oldman. It demonstrated that the Young Playwrights Award is not simply a celebration of youthful talent but a genuine pathway into professional theatre. At the Royal Court, promising young writers are not treated as artists of the future; they are recognised as playwrights of the present.
The Royal Court Young Playwrights Award performances had an atmosphere all of their own. Audience seating stretched along both sides of the stage, while among the spectators sat the young playwrights themselves, surrounded by proud parents, friends and teachers. Every time New Writers & Participation Producer Tabitha Hayward announced a writer’s name, the room erupted into applause and cheers. It felt less like an awards ceremony than a celebration of a community coming together to champion one another’s work. Long before the first line was spoken, the theatre was already buzzing with anticipation, nerves and the unmistakable energy of youth.
Before the 16–18 category performance, Royal Court Executive Director Will Young explained the thinking behind the programme. “We want more young people to write plays,” he said, before joking, “Not every playwright has to be dead,” prompting laughter from the audience. He went on to argue that playwriting is not only about mastering language and dramatic structure, but also about imagining perspectives beyond our own. Good drama, he suggested, creates space for dialogue and empathy—qualities he believes the next generation will need more than ever.
The three plays in the 13–15 category were remarkable for their imaginative storytelling and emotional honesty, capturing anxieties and hopes that felt unmistakably rooted in adolescence.
Rufus Peaty’s You’ll Live begins with an intriguing premise: a teenage girl buys a £5.39 prom dress on Vinted, only for it to become increasingly sinister. While the setup recalls classic cursed-object stories, the play is ultimately less interested in horror than in the fears of growing up. Beneath its supernatural surface lies a moving exploration of vulnerability, friendship and the reassurance that love and trust can offer when anxiety begins to overwhelm.
Lucy Edda Leggatt’s Fruit shifts between the seventeenth century and the present, weaving together religious fanaticism, anorexia and the making of a scapegoat. A striking image of Eve biting into an apple evokes Eden and distils centuries of ideas surrounding temptation, sin and the female body. As contemporary characters excavate traces of the past, the play suggests that old patterns of persecution continue to resurface in new forms. The imagery of witch hunts and religious extremism finds unsettling echoes in modern obsessions with purity, body image and social conformity.
Lucy Varley’s A Shadow on the Ocean is modest in scale but rich in emotional depth. With little more than a lifeboat, a stranded boy and girl are left with nothing to do but talk. A well-timed joke about Life of Pi draws easy laughter before the conversation quietly shifts towards love, family and mortality. As the girl’s questions gradually chip away at his reserve, the boy reveals a warmth and vulnerability that had remained hidden beneath his silence. The play demonstrates how compelling theatre can emerge from the simplest of premises, relying on dialogue rather than spectacle to create emotional depth.
The 16–18 category shifted its focus outward, engaging more directly with contemporary society and the divisions shaping modern Britain.
Thomas Mossman’s Bus Stop of Strangers unfolds at a seemingly ordinary bus stop, where a father draped in a Union Jack waits alongside his son after a night spent at the police station. The arrival of a drunken law student turns the encounter into a heated debate about politics, masculinity and generational conflict. No one truly listens, and no one changes their mind. By the end, the son’s quiet resignation speaks more loudly than the arguments themselves.
In You Can’t Say That, Dhaani Singh explores the increasingly fraught relationship between a mother and daughter. The mother genuinely wants to understand her daughter’s generation—scrolling through Instagram, embracing unfamiliar food and trying to keep pace with changing social attitudes. Yet a conversation over dinner about immigration and politics quickly spirals into mutual accusations. The daughter brands her mother racist; the mother feels equally misunderstood. Rather than taking sides, the play captures the painful reality that the language of political correctness, identity and generational change often leaves both generations feeling unheard.
Lucy Nicholas’s Build-a-Boyfriend (please don’t leave) brought the programme to an emotionally uplifting close. Bursting onto the stage with dance, laughter and infectious energy, it gradually reveals a story rooted in fear—of abandonment, loneliness and losing the people we love. Through conversations about their deepest fears, the play gradually reveals the vulnerability beneath its playful fantasy. In the end, it is not the perfect boyfriend who offers comfort, but the care, loyalty and friendship of those already around us. With warmth and gentle humour, the play reminds us that growing up is never something we do alone.
Across all six plays, a common thread gradually emerged. These young playwrights seemed to be writing the words they themselves longed to hear—words of reassurance from friends, understanding from parents, or simply the hope that someone would continue to believe in them. Parents often appeared as sources of conflict, yet they were also the people whose understanding the characters sought most desperately. Personal struggles expanded into questions of school, friendship, politics and society, revealing not only the anxieties of adolescence but also the values shaping a new generation. Throughout the performances, quiet sniffles could be heard around the auditorium, and more than a few audience members wiped away tears. Stories written by young people possess a rare authenticity: they offer comfort to their peers while inviting older generations to see the world through younger eyes.
Although presented as rehearsed readings, the performances rarely felt unfinished. Scripts remained in the actors’ hands, and staging was deliberately minimal, yet the cast created vivid worlds with little more than a glance, a movement, or a single line of dialogue. The young writers’ ideas, combined with the experience of professional actors, directors and creatives, made it easy to imagine these plays as fully realised productions. Rather than feeling like works in progress, the readings demonstrated the extraordinary theatrical potential already present on the page.
All six winning plays have now been published in a free digital anthology by Nick Hern Books, allowing readers to encounter these emerging voices beyond the theatre. More importantly, the programme refuses to treat them simply as “the playwrights of tomorrow”. Their work is performed, published and discussed. That distinction matters. Playwrights do not emerge overnight; they develop through opportunities to write, hear their work aloud, revise, fail and write again. The Royal Court Young Playwrights Award provides exactly that environment, offering a meaningful first step into professional theatre while reinforcing the Royal Court’s long-standing commitment to nurturing new writing.
Perhaps the programme’s greatest achievement lies in bringing a new generation’s perspective onto the stage. As Royal Court Executive Director Will Young observed before the performances, good drama asks us to imagine viewpoints other than our own. Across these six plays, parents and children, friends, political opponents and people carrying different fears and hopes repeatedly struggled to understand one another. Even when agreement proves impossible, the willingness to listen, to imagine another perspective and to accept difference remains one of theatre’s most valuable gifts. In that sense, the Young Playwrights Award is doing far more than discovering new playwrights; it is cultivating the empathy on which the future of theatre, and perhaps society itself, depends.
Follow Us