2 mins read

Based on the relationship between Virginia Woolf and Vita Sackville-West. In the years prior to Woolf’s acclaimed and controversial publication of Orlando. This is a film that should have offered a rich tapestry of literature and female sexuality in 20s Britain. However, Vita and Virginia fail to fly. Offering a film that plays to 1920’s cliches, with a script and artistic direction that delivers a confused final product.

Visually parts of Vita and Virginia are a delight, capturing the atmosphere of 1920’s Bermondsey beautifully. However, its script often feels torn from the pages of an Enid Blyton book. Paying more of a homage to The Famous Five than the literary giants it aims to portray. Arterton and Debicki offer solid performances but are never truly allowed to shine. As the film jumps from scene to scene with little space for relationships to develop fully. Male and female characters feel one dimensional. Leaving no space for audience reflection on the interface between hidden sexuality and marriages of convenience. Equally the films handling of sexuality and sexual liberation offers little analysis of 1920’s social constructs. Or the wider 20’s society sitting outside the bubble of wealth and opulence.

The film’s soundtrack feels as though it’s been ripped from a 1980’s film, never matching the era on screen or the relationship it portrays. Ultimately adding little emotion to scenes where music should increase audience emotion and attachment.

The end result is a film that feels disjointed, lacklustre and ultimately confused.

Previous Story

Ben is Back (Review)

Next Story

Girl (Review)